Introduction

Introduction: Green technology is an energy type that some groups in the United States are striving to fully implement into our society. There are also some groups very opposed to green technology. Each group has many reasons why they are for or against green technology. Green technology is technology used to reverse the negative effects humans have on the environment by alternative energy. There are many different types of green energy forms, some forms are Solar energy, Wind energy, Hydroelectric energy, Landfill gas, and Biomass fuel. For some people “green technology” was a topic that came to them in the last few years but it has been around for a while. Green Technology advocates will say that the benefits from using this energy makes you money from the costs, opponents will say that fossil fuels are well established and can provide energy at lower costs than renewable energy.
History Paragraph: Green technology came across many people’s minds during waves throughout the last 40 years. “The 1970s saw a burst of meaningful research into wind, solar and other alternatives, all motivated by the sudden spike in energy costs and the dawning realization of the environmental crisis”(Walsh). This research was stopped when Reagan took office and the oil prices dropped. During the last ten years more people took it as an initiative among themselves to “go green” and either get solar panels installed on there house or got an electric car. Society’s perception of energy is derived by “cheap” and “accessible”. Fossil fuels make up 80 percent of our energy now, while green energy makes up 20 percent.
First body paragraph “pro green technology”:

Introduction

Introduction:
IFRS: The International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB, sets the models for and administers IFRS. IFRS, as a contrasting option to GAAP, is a procedure guided by distributed benchmarks and rules that bookkeepers in remote nations use to plan money related explanations for open organizations. At present, IFRS centers around extensive or open organizations. Be that as it may, in the IASB’s endeavors to make IFRS the genuine worldwide standard, it is thinking about changes to encourage utilization of IFRS by little organizations.
GAAP: Dissimilar to IFRS, which is administered exclusively by the IASB, two elements set the benchmarks for and represent GAAP. The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, which centers around open organizations, is the essential administering body. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, or AICPA, which centers around littler privately owned businesses, gives noteworthy info and inclusion from the privately owned business point of view. Due to the double contribution, GAAP has measures that are genuinely direct for both open organizations and little privately owned businesses. Organizations and their CPAs utilize GAAP to both plan and review organization monetary proclamations.

Body:
IFRS and US GAAP union is a point which has been occasionally inspected in Paper P2 exams. It is of proceeding with significance, both as a potential exam point and furthermore in a business setting where organizations might be influenced by this procedure.
The point is deserving of survey as there have been improvements as of late, and the Paper P2 syllabus incorporates current issues with particular reference to union amongst national and universal detailing norms. Commonly, one of the inquiries accessible in Section B of the exam paper has a present issue center, and will be founded on late advancements.
This article likewise compresses a portion of the key changes to aggregate book keeping which have been influenced by the joining procedure, for the most part the new prerequisites of IFRS 3 (Revised). Furthermore, the related point of first-time appropriation of IFRS has likewise been incorporated.
GAAP and IFRS are similar from multiple points of view, in this manner making the meeting a feasible assignment. The theoretical systems of the two strategies are fundamentally the same as in structure, alluding to their bookkeeping destinations, components, and subjective attributes. A noteworthy comparability amongst GAAP and IFRS is that the two measures utilize a pay proclamation, a monetary record, and an announcement of money streams. When managing money and money reciprocals, the two strategies are basically the same. Another real similitude is that both GAAP and IFRS get ready monetary proclamations on a gathered premise; which means income is perceived when it is acknowledged or feasible. There are numerous different likenesses amongst GAAP and IFRS and will along these lines help in an entire meeting sooner rather than later, yet before there is one worldwide budgetary bookkeeping set of measures, the contrasts amongst GAAP and IFRS must be thought about.
Benefit of IFRS:
1. Unifies business transactions, One of the real points of the International Financial Reporting Standards is basically to put every individual in the entire world on one level with regards to putting forth money related expressions. This empowers residential firms to show their financials on comparable levels as their remote rivals. Notwithstanding that, associations with different backups in different mainland’s are likewise going to have the capacity to set up their money related proclamations in an all-inclusive bookkeeping dialect that is comprehended by everybody.
2. Saves cost, since a wide range of organizations are presently receiving IFRS, this will be an awesome preferred standpoint for organizations with outside activities. IFRS empowers inside consistency with respect to planning budgetary reports. This implies the cost will be lessened since every one of the reports will be done in a uniform way in all the diverse branches of the organization.
3. Provides consistency, The best thing about IFRS is the way that it permits organizations having distinctive backups to streamline their preparation, examining, announcing guidelines and task norms and in addition advancement principles. Regardless of whether worldwide or residential, their workplaces could adjust a similar announcing systems and models giving predictable and exact detailing and friends records.
By and by, there are a few disadvantages of IFRS. One of the principle disadvantages is that it is very costly to actualize these measures. This is on the grounds that you need to prepare your representatives with respect to the down to earth ramifications of these measures to their work. Benefit of GAAP:
1. Significance, rules enable organizations to keep up consistency in their introduction of money related data, decrease the danger of deception and stay away from misrepresentation. GAAP was made to shield the privileges of partners, including speculators. It considers organizations in charge of their budgetary announcing exercises, in this way giving more noteworthy confirmation to every single invested individual. Using GAAP rules, organizations give genuine and reasonable introduction of monetary data.
2. Stakeholder’s Trust, showing your data utilizing GAAP additionally ingrains confide in those with an enthusiasm for your organization. There are numerous conceivable approaches to control the budgetary data of an organization, and ordinarily, a basic alteration to the way things are introduced changes the substance of money related explanations. These progressions can make the peruse translate the announcements uniquely in contrast to if the alterations were not connected. Following GAAP rules offers confirmation to anybody intrigued by your organization that your budgetary proclamations were readied utilizing standard rules.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Harmonization is a procedure of expanding the similarity of bookkeeping hones by settling the points of confinement to their level of variety. Harmonization conveys a more extensive importance than institutionalization despite the fact that it is at times being utilized bury variably.
Christopher and Robert in their book “Relative International Accounting” have characterized the term Harmonization as ‘a procedure of expanding the similarity of bookkeeping rehearses by setting limits to their level of variety while institutionalization seems to suggest the burden of a more unbending and restricted arrangement of principles.”
Simply harmonization implies not just bringing out consistency by diminishing choices and contrasts in systems by setting particular limits, however grasps a mixing and consolidating the components of bookkeeping practices of different nations into a methodical structure.
There is weight for harmonization of dissimilar bookkeeping hones from the clients of monetary explanations as well as from the individuals who direct and set them up. Weights originate from the speculators and budgetary experts to encourage venture and credit choices.
The budgetary investigators are of the view that global assorted variety in bookkeeping rehearses has enough possibility to crush the worldwide stream of capital. The Investors are likewise putting weight for harmonization as they want that monetary data ought be coherent as well as.

Conclusion:
The IFRS were set up in 2001 and embraced by the European Union in 2005. The expectation is that all the world’s organizations will move to these measures to help speculators and agents everywhere throughout the world better comprehend the budgetary circumstance of organizations they put resources into, work with, or stretch out credit to. Additionally, a standard framework is a motivator for recently entrepreneur countries, particularly China, to create bookkeeping that meets world benchmarks.

Introduction

Introduction.
Thesis statement: some people think working with autism is a hard thing to do due to the incapability of working full-time and doing physical tasks and also they can’t interact socially while others think that they have hidden potentials , also they are very skilled in particular areas.
some people think that Working with autism is hard physically .
Most autistic adults can’t commit to full-time jobs.
They get tired quickly and lose attention also quickly.
Only 6% of autistic adults can work full-time jobs .
They can’t do physical tasks.
Autism affect their ability to do physical work .
According to the article ” can I continue working with autism ?” the social security administration says autism limits the kinds of interests of an autistic person and can lead to a difficulty for an autistic person to do work if it isn’t in his narrow interests .
They also think that Working with autism is hard mentally.
Mainly it affects their ability to socially interact .
They can’t interact or communicate with other people .
According to the article ” can I continue working with autism ?” people who suffer from classic autism or more severe form of autism can’t work in jobs that requires any interaction with people .
They face periods of decompression.
They are periods of high stress which they behave socially inappropriate and sometimes violently in.
According to the article “can I continue working with autism ?” some autistic people are unable to adapt in work environments due to the decompression periods.
On the other hand some think that autistic people can work due to this physical reasons.
They have hidden potentials.
This potentials are recognizing patterns , logical reasoning and finding irregularities in data and arguments .
According to the article ” the hidden potentials of autistic kids” Dr. soulieres said that there was an autistic woman who worked with her in lab who can find the slightest flaws in logic where they’d argue with her at first but at the end she’s always right.
They are very skilled in particular areas .
Some have many skills in music, science and art and in every field in life.
Mozart was said to have suffered from Asperger’s syndrome which is a type of autism but we can’t deny that he was a genius in the music field.
And they think there’s also Mental reasons why an autistic can work .
Some of them are high-functioning and there’s benefits to this .
The high-functioning of them can adjust to work environments and they can work full-time jobs.
According to raven test in the article “the hidden potentials of autistic kids” the autistic people who were considered low-functioning are actually high-functioning that was proved using different intelligence tests like raven.
Some are falsely considered as mentally retarded .
Statistics showed that from 70% to 80% are mentally retarded but that’s not true .
According to the article “the hidden potentials of autistic kids” Meredeth edelson a researcher at Willamette university searched for the source of this statistics and she didn’t find anything conclusive.
Conclusion .

Introduction

Introduction: In philosophy, the concept of the good life is one that has been discussed throughout history. In summary, the good life is an optimally lived life. Many philosophers have different views on how to live the good life, making the good life a matter of perspective. One can either view aspects of their life, such as work and uncontrollable events, positively or negatively. Thus, the good life is dependent on how an individual perceives the world. Since good is defined as: to be desired of or approved of, then the good life must be a life in which an individual perceives the world in a desirable manner. This is evident when analyzing philosophical views of the workforce, the beliefs of stoicism, and absurdism.

Paragraph 1: Many different philosophical teachings have different opinions on how the workplace should be structured and how citizens should view work. Epicureanism believes that work is a source of pain, not pleasure. Therefore, the more an individual wants something, the more they must work, implying that they are a slave to their desires. To the contrary, Karl Marx deduces that work is what makes humans unique. Through work, individuals can live, create, and flourish. However, Karl Marx beliefs that what makes work a positive aspect in human life is suppressed by capitalism. He claims that capitalism creates a working environment that does not allow us to express our true selves, develop our talents, and prevents humans from fulfilling their productive nature. Marx argues that labor is alienated under a capitalist society through products, process, and people. When working, individuals make things, but own nothing that is produced. They have no say in what they are doing and how they do it, furthermore they must compete with others resulting in conflict and divide. When considering all of Marx’s arguments on how capitalism is flawed, one might question the reasoning behind why it is implemented in most modern and thriving countries. Capitalism may have flaws, but it also has positive aspects. Through capitalism citizens are capable of making more money by working harder and taking advantage of whatever situation presents itself. Thus, by being more effective in the workplace they not only benefit society but are compensated for their work, allowing them to purchase what they desire. Philosophers such as Adam Smith and Ayn Rand, as well as economists such as Thomas Malthus and David Ricardo are strong supporters of capitalism, implying they disagree with Karl Marx and communist views on the workforce. When all of these perspectives and ideologies are taken into consideration, one thing becomes very evident; how an individual views the workplace is directly responsible for whether they find work desirable. In order to live the good life, the actions one performs throughout their life must be desirable and/or approved of. Therefore, certain individuals are only capable of living the good life under specific circumstances as a result of their perspective of the world. For example, Karl Marx would be incapable of living the good life while in a capitalist society, because under those circumstance he would feel as though his human nature is being suppressed. The likes of Adam Smith and Ayn Rand would feel unproductive in a communist work environment, because they would believe that they are not bettering society. Epicureanism followers are simply against the concept of work as a whole, and thus in order to live a good life they must avoid work as it is not desirable. However, in reality it is unrealistic to not work, or be in a society that has a work environment that mirrors one’s desires. As a result, in order to live the good life an individual must either find the perfect workplace, create their own work environment, or view work from a different perspective in which allows them to desire it. Rarely does an individual have the opportunity to control their work environment, so it is logical for human beings to make themselves perceive the world in a positive light. If this is done, they will be able to live the good life, as everything they do will be considered desirable or approved.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Paragraph 2: Another way in which it is evident that the good life is dependent on perceiving the world in a desirable manner, is by analyzing stoicism. The main ideology in stoicism is that an individual must accept what happens in life in order to be happy. This is logically correct. If an individual accepts everything that happens to them in life, that means that they approve of everything, making everything good. If everything in life is good, then an individual is undoubtedly living the good life. However stoic philosopher Epictetus, along with most stoics not only believe that one should accept everything that happens, but they have no control over anything, because everything is pre planned. Whether these teaching are true hold no relevance when it comes to living the good life, as one perceive events as acceptable regardless of if they have any control over it. For example, if a loved one passes away their death can either be mourned or their life can be celebrated. Furthermore, under such circumstances an individual can either deny such events from having happened, or accept what has occured, and live with the results. If somebody mourns the death of a loved one, or is in denial, they will be under a dark mind state that prevents the good life from existing. However, if the death of a loved one is accepted, and it is recognized that the events leading to the death were unpreventable, one can celebrate their family members life, and approve of their passing more peacefully. As a result, the individual who accepted their loved ones death would be able to live the good life, because they approve of everything that occurs, regardless of whether they have negative stigmas. In fact, this example is even more valid when considering the buddhist teaching that old age, illness, and death are not bad, we simply want the opposite, causing us to perceive them as bad. Overall, stoicism presents a lense that proves everyone can live the good life if they choose to accept what happens to them, and view sed events positively.

Paragraph 3: One of the darkest sentences to sum up life was presented by Albert Camus in his absurdism teachings. He states that “to be alive is to suffer”. This crucial idea is a paradox when it comes to living the good life. In order to live the good life, an individual must accept what happens to them in order to make it more desirable. Thus, one must accept their suffering, and view it as an aspect of life that gives joy value through contrast. By undergoing this thought process, one cannot suffer, as the idea of suffering no longer has a negative connotation, and by definition, to suffer implies to experience or be subjected to something bad. This is why absurdism concludes that life is in fact absurd. Life follows no rational path, but that does not imply that it cannot be good. “Yes, we will die, but we shouldn’t allow that fact to inform or constrain all of our actions or decisions. We must be willing to live in spite of death, create meaning in spite of objective meaninglessness, and find value in spite of the tragic, even comic, absurdity of what goes on around us”.

Conclusion: Overall, the good life is living a desirable life, which can only be achieved by developing a perspective of the world that is approved of by oneself. By choosing to see the world in a positive light, and individual can only increase in positivity, because humans beings reflect the environment in which they are in. Similarly to what the homeless man told Christopher Mccandless in Into The Wild, “The good gets better”.

x

Hi!
I'm Owen!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out