In the modern world

In the modern world, it may seem as if people cannot live without technologies like their cell phones, computers, laptops, tablets, etc. These technologies have become an imperative part of communicating in our day to day lives. For some people, it might be difficult to imagine how a day might go without the use of these technologies. There are also people who purposefully limit their use of phones and computers. To understand communication technologies and the roles they play it is best to look at them in terms of advantages and disadvantages. This paper will create a framework to illustrate the factors that influence the ways in which utopian and dystopian outcomes occur
Undeniably, there has been a huge increase in new forms of technology and the availability of information. People have the ability to connect through many networks, providing communication links that no one even thought were possible as little as ten years ago (Caron, 2015). For that reason, people have a lot of different views on how they think this technology will affect society. For example, these technological advances excite researchers, developers, journalists, and the people that like to stay up to date with new things or like to stay as connected as possible. Many people take on a utopian view of what technology means for our world long-term. It is vital to point out that a utopian view does not necessarily apply to the technologies themselves, but rather, the opportunities they provide. It’s helpful to look at this view as an, “analyses in which the use of specific technologies plays a key role in shaping a utopian vision, in which their use easily makes life enchanting and liberating for nearly everyone” (Kling, 1996).
This view encompasses all of the people who benefit from sharing information/media, learning new things, connecting with new people, as well as, maintaining relationships. This abundance of information has led to the globalization of our world. Ideas, concepts, images, music, services, etc. are attainable from across the world because of these networks. We are also able to connect with our loved ones regardless of where they are geographically. “Researchers have identified the capacity of the Internet to liberate interpersonal relationships from the confines of physical locality and create opportunities for new personal relationships and communities” (Rheingold, 1993). We now have the ability to reach out to our strong, weak or latent ties by simply sending a message via social media at the touch of our fingertips. There is no time delay and we can be chatting with someone hundreds of miles away, in an instant.
Just as there are those who predict that the internet will liberate relationships and benefit our communities, there are also those who fear what widespread technological advances may ruin our “human nature”. Birkerts talks about his concern that people will experience increased alienation with the continued use of communication technologies. He writes, “Immersed in an environment of invisible signals and operations, we find it as unthinkable to walk five miles to visit a friend as it was once unthinkable to speak across that distance through a wire” (Birkerts, 1996). This a good example of how any new technology can bring about the good and the bad. A major concern facing communication technologies is that they have, and will continue to, create a disconnect from people and their presence in day to day life. Specifically, there are concerns that people are replacing face to face interactions and prioritizing social interaction online (Zemmels, 2012).
Stemming from this idea, are the issues that online communication is not as personal and has made it more difficult to communicate face to face. Online communication occurs largely through social media networks, which often means you are speaking through text-based messages instead of face to face or phone calls. This allows us to communicate in short, carefully constructed messages that lack the immediacy and nonverbal cues that we are used to. This may come across as less personal and gives opens up an opportunity for strangers to fake an identity or falsify information about themselves. “There are no universal standards for posting information online, and digital information may be easily altered, plagiarized, misrepresented, or created anonymously under false pretenses” (Metzger 2007). For these reasons, a major worry exists that online relationships can be less meaningful, shallow and impersonal. People who connect with others primarily through technology might find it difficult to engage in normal conversation, since they may have issues understanding nonverbal cues due to lack of practice with face to face conversations that can’t be edited or filtered (Ramos-Soler, 2018).

In the modern world

In the modern world, the worldwide web is one of the by-products of the advancements in technology which has enhanced various fields such as research. In this essay, this technological aspect is imperative since it enhances the critical analysis of two web pages in regards to the legalization of drugs. These web pages include web page one which dwells on why don’t we legalize drugs ( and web page two which focuses on Three Concepts You Need to Grasp if You Want to Know Whether to Legalize Drugs Yes, Even Heroin ( Across the globe, legalization of drugs has remained to be one of the controversial subjects. Drugs such as heroin and marijuana have been highly contested in regards to undergoing legalization. With the help of the world wide web, this essay explores the two web pages in order to provide a coherent account about the whole subject of drug legalization.
Web page One
Usage of drugs is attributed with massive consequences which emanate from the whole aspect of legalization. Legal drugs are readily accessible to people most especially in the pharmacies. In comparison with illegal drugs, legal drugs have been imputed with direct deaths which are triggered by the consumption of large amounts. Some of these drugs include benzodiazepines and opiates. For instance, in the human body system, opiates play a significant role in relieving severe pain most especially among cancer patients. However, these drugs contribute greatly to direct deaths as compared to other illegal drugs. In the modern world, illegal drugs such as tobacco and alcohol has been legalized posing a high threat on people. The threat that is ascribed with illegal drugs is manifest on both the users as well as other people such as the relatives of the user. According to scientific studies, alcohol consumption in the United States contributes to 3.3 million deaths annually (Vargic, et al., 2016). In 1920, the United States imposed a prohibition policy on the sale of all alcohol beverages which was attributed with failure. The policy’s aim was to help mitigate the prevalent cases of family violence, crime, corruption as well as boost hygiene and health. Illegal drugs are also ascribed with effects such as drug addiction. Drug addiction is considered to be weightier when compared to other aspects of life such as symptoms of mental illness and seeking of financial guidance (Vargic, et al., 2016).
According to statistics, 63% of the individuals who use alcohol exhibit a tendency as well as an history in using other illegal drugs (Vargic, et al., 2016). Abuse of drugs is common among individuals who suffer from depression which is stimulated by neglection from the society. Drug abuse is prevalent among the teenagers who perceive it as a rebellious way of evading the rules of the society. This has been enhanced through the technological advancements whereby individuals can be able to order drugs using the online platforms. Legalization of drugs can help decline the number of drug users. For instance, in Netherlands, the legalization of marijuana resulted to a decline in the number of smokers.
The selling, possession and manufacture of illegal drugs should be legalized with regulations. First, prohibition does not limit individuals from accessing illegal drugs. This implies, prohibition augments the drug abuse rates since individuals with the drug problem cannot be discouraged in possessing the drugs. Second, the government will be able to regulate the origin and quality of the illegal drugs. This will help the government to sensitize the general public on the effects associated with recreational drugs thus mitigating harm in the society. Third, legalization of the illegal drugs can help generate revenue. The government will be able to collect revenue which will foster development projects. Conversely, this money could be help fund criminal and terrorist groups which propagate harm in the society. Moreover, illegal drugs should be legalized since the already legalized drugs such as alcohol negatively affect the society (Vargic, et al., 2016).
Critical evaluation of Web Page One
This web page is created with an aim of sampling out the ideologies, views, opinions and beliefs of people in regards to the whole aspect of drug legalization. This web page is a question and answer website which seeks to share information on the reasons why illegal drugs should be legalized. Quora is a private website (.com) which provides easiness in terms of access if information. The content of the website is valid and relevant since the information is attributed with illustrations such as graphs. The webpage also portrays good grammar since the users undertake editing of both the question and answers before presenting them to the public. The web page does not exhibit any biasness since it gives all individuals an opportunity to issue their opinions. This implies that the web page is open hence not inclined to any political or religious group in showcasing any ideologies. The web page was first was first publicized in 2013 with different authors responding to the question why should illegal drugs be legalized. The revision of the web-page was in 2016 when a different author responded with a different answer. The web page’s links are active since they are connected to information from different webpages. The web page comprises of a series of authors who offer different opinions. These authors do not issue personal information thus posing an impossibility in case of seeking contact with them. As a website-only page, this web page seeks to address the general readers in regards to the legalization of drugs. The website provides gross account of the subject since every author emerges with different views which address the subject of drug legalization. In terms of data provision, this web page provides graphs which support the arguments and opinions of the different authors.
Web page Two
Over the years, the support for the legalization of illegal drugs has grown evenly. This support has been triggered by the effects of the act on the both the users and the society as a whole. For instance, In Colorado state in America, the legalization of marijuana augmented the tax collections thus fostering the support of the legalization process. This support can be attributed with countries such as Switzerland which legalized heroin as well as Portugal. Legalization of drugs in these nations resulted to an increase in the standards of living as well as a decline in criminal activities. The legalization of drugs is attributed with three concepts which include the risk premium, why criminals commit crime and prohibition as a vast investment bank for crime (Hari, 2016). In the risk premium, legalization of drugs reduces the price of the prohibited drug thus increasing the number of users. In prohibition of drugs, dealers engage in other forms of criminality such as human trafficking and kidnapping. This implies that prohibition is not the viable solution since it will attract many criminal gangs. Moreover, most criminals are engraved in criminal activities since they receive a large incentive. This huge incentive is triggered by the prohibition of the drug market (Hari, 2016). Therefore, legalization of drugs will drive out most of the criminal gangs from the drug business into other activities since their large incentives will be driven out.
Critical evaluation of Web Page Two
This web page was created with an aim of sharing information about the relationship of human beings with drugs. The web page is a news bureau (.com) which is owned by the Vice magazine in giving the readers news in regards to culture, arts and other news topics thus providing easiness in the access of information. The information in the web page is coherently organized through the use of numbering and highlighting of the sub-topics. The web page also exhibits good grammar since the author is an experienced author. His experience emerges from the writing of other articles which have been published by the influence. In terms of biasness, the webpage is not inclined to any religious or political group. The writer openly expresses his ideologies citing information from other authors in regards to the subject of drug legalization. The web page was first published in 2016. Over the years, the web page has no undergone any modification. In terms of links, the web page does not exhibit any active links which are directly connected to information from other web pages. The author issues personal information such as a twitter account which can enhance communication in case of any inquiry. The web page is a website-only page which regards the general readers as the main audience. In regards to addressing the subject of drug legalization, the web page vastly addresses the subject since it offers statistical data to support the arguments.
A good research paper dwells on various aspects of a topic. In the two web pages, I would recommend web page one for the preparation of a speech in addressing the subject of drug legalization. This is because this web page exhibits an array of many authors. These authors provide varying opinions which are beneficial in conducting a research.
This essay explores web page one and two in determining which web page is viable in preparation of a research paper or a speech. Legalization of drugs is one of the controversial subjects across the globe. Most individuals have enhanced support for this action citing reference from some of the nations which have undergone the act. They regard legalization of drugs to be critical in a country’s economy since it enhances the standards of living and minimizes crime. The contentious question is whether each nation across the world should abolish the prohibition policies of drugs and legalize drugs.
Hari, Johann. (2016) “Three Concepts You Need to Grasp if You Want to Know Whether to Legalize Drugs (Yes, Even Heroin).” Vice, Accessed 11 Nov. 2018.
“Why Don’t We Legalize Drugs? If Cigarettes and Alcohol Can Be Made Legal, Why Not Drugs? – Quora.” Quora – A Place to Share Knowledge and Better Understand the World, Accessed 11 Nov. 2018.
Colorado State University, S. (n.d.). Research Guides: How to Do Library Research: Home. Retrieved from


I'm Owen!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out