Assignment the host. 2 OR Parasitoids are

Assignment No: 02
Topic: Parasitoids
Submitted by: Areej Arif, Amna Tanzeel, Ayesha Sohail, Asad Naseer, Aleena Ahsan
Roll No: 17130814-001, 002, 003, 004, 005(Group#1)
Submitted to: Dr. Mubashar Hussain Sb.

Department of Zoology.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Definition of Parasitoids
Introduction of parasitoids
Parasitoid is an insect and especially a wasp that completes its larval development within the body of another insect which it eventually kills and that is free-living as an adult an insect and especially a wasp that completes its larval development within the body of another insect which it eventually kills and that is free-living as an adult. 1
A parasitoid is an organism that lives on or in a host organism and ultimately kills the host. 2
Parasitoids are an important biological tool used widely in agriculture for the suppression of various pest species. 3
Karma is a real pest for parasitoids, tiny parasitic wasps that lay their eggs on caterpillars. 4
Parasitoid was firstly studied by a naturalist named Maria Sibylla Merian in 1647-1717. 5 Swedo-Finnish writer Odo Morannal Reuter gave the term of “parasitoid” in 1913. 6 A reviewer of Swedo, William Morton Wheeler adopted this term in English. 7 Reuter used it to describe the process where the parasite develops in or on the body of a single host individual, sooner or later killing that host, while the adult is free-living. Since that time, the concept has been generalized and widely applied. 8
Parasitoids can be classified as either endo- or ectoparasitoids with idiobiont or koinobiont developmental strategies. Endoparasitoids live within their host’s body, while ectoparasitoids feed on the host from outside. Idiobiont parasitoids prevent further development of the host after initially immobilizing it, whereas koinobiont parasitoids allow the host to continue its development while feeding upon it. Most ectoparasitoids are idiobiont, as the host could damage or dislodge the external parasitoid if allowed to move and  HYPERLINK “” o “Moulting” moult. Most endoparasitoids are koinobionts, giving them the advantage of a host that continues to grow larger and avoid predators. 9
The simplest relationship is in case of primary parasitoids which involves two organisms, the host and the parasitoid.  HYPERLINK “” o “Hyperparasitoid” Hyperparasitoids are parasitoids of parasitoids; secondary parasitoids have a primary parasitoid as their host, so there are three organisms involved. Hyperparasitoids are either facultative (can be a primary parasitoid or a hyperparasitoid depending on the situation) or obligate (always develop as a hyperparasitoid). Levels of parasitoids beyond secondary also occur, especially among facultative parasitoids. In oak gall systems, there can be up to five levels of parasitism. 10 Cases in which two or more species of parasitoids simultaneously attack the same host without parasitizing each other are called multi- or multiple parasitism. In many cases, multiple parasitism still leads to the death of one or more of the parasitoids involved. If multiple parasitoids of the same species coexist in a single host, it is called  HYPERLINK “” o “Superparasitism” superparasitism. Gregarious species lay multiple eggs or polyembryonic eggs which lead to multiple larvae in a single host. The end result of gregarious superparasitism can be a single surviving parasitoid individual or multiple surviving individuals, depending on the species. If superparasitism occurs accidentally in normally solitary species the larvae often fight among themselves until only one is left. 11, 12
Parasitoids have evolved effective and efficient methods of successful parasitism, many of which involve utilization of multimodal cues 13. Many dipteran parasitoids in the family Phoridae use social insects as hosts due to the reliability of their intraspecific chemical communication signals that make for effective host selection cues 14–15. Phorid fly adults parasitize ants by hovering over insect hosts and then diving down to insert an egg beneath the insect’s exoskeleton 16,17-19. Phorid flies have direct parasitic effects on ants (i.e., cause ant mortality) and also significantly change ant foraging behavior by limiting host resource acquisition behavior, modifying ant competitive hierarchies, and dampening ant effects on herbivores 20-25. There are phorids that attack ants from at least 22 genera across 5 subfamilies. Likewise, more than 20 genera of phorids attack ant hosts 26. With such taxonomic diversification in ant-phorid relationships, the types of cues used by phorids to locate, select, and successfully parasitize ant hosts are also quite diverse.

Successful parasitism requires a series of interactions between a parasitoid and its host. The process can be categorized into five general and sometimes overlapping steps:
(a) host habitat location, (b) host location, (c) host acceptance, (d) host discrimination, and (e) host regulation 13.

For phorid parasitoids, host location involves the use of both habitat and host cues. Host habitat location is the use of environmental cues by the parasitoid to select areas to search for potential hosts. These cues may be directly related to the preferred environment of the host itself (e.g., volatiles from plants commonly used by hosts) or related to the parasitoid’s general habitat preferences (light, temperature, and humidity conditions within a given area) 13. The host location process also requires that a parasitoid use long-range cues to be directed to its’ host. However, unlike host habitat location cues, these cues come directly from the host itself. Ants communicate interspecifically by using complex pheromones. These pheromones often act as host location cues for parasitoids as they can be both reliable (with volatile pheromones highly conserved within a species or genus) and detectable (ants, being eusocial, live in relatively high densities, and can produce large volumes of volatile pheromones) for the parasitoid 27. Once a phorid parasitoid has located a potential host through long-range cues, the parasitoid requires host acceptance cues to trigger the parasitoid’s oviposition behavior. Short-range cues such as movement, host size, and contact chemical cues have all been implicated in triggering phorid fly oviposition 28, 29-39.

In addition to the cues that are required for overall host selection, host discrimination cues, used by parasitoids to detect and reject potential hosts that have been previously parasitized, can be present. While these cues are not necessary for parasitism, they can increase the likelihood of offspring success 13. Parasitoids can also increase the success rate of their offspring through host regulation, whereby parasitoids manipulate their hosts to promote the development of the next generation of parasitoids. Host regulation can involve altering the physiology of the host to facilitate growth and development of egg, larvae, or pupae of the parasitoid or altering host behavior to optimize nutrient intake or location within the external environment 40.

Reference: (DeBach, 1964; Hagen et al., 1971; Huffaker and Messenger, 1976).

Mitch Leslie, Science | AAAS, “How one parasitic wasp becomes the victim—of another parasitic wasp,” 30 Apr. 2018
Todd, Kim (2011). “Maria Sibylla Merian (1647-1717): an early investigator of parasitoids and phenotypic plasticity”. Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews. 4(2): 131–144.

Reuter, Odo M. (1913). Lebensgewohnheiten und Instinkte der Insekten (in German). FriendlanderWheeler, William Morton (1923). Social life among the insects: being a series of lectures delivered at the Lowell Institute in Boston in March 1922. Harcourt, Brace. Previously published in Scientific Monthly, June 1922 to February 1923
Godfray, H. C. J. (1994). Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton University Press. 
Gullan, P. J.; Cranston, P. S. (2014). The Insects: An Outline of Entomology (5th ed.). Wiley. pp. 362–370
Askew, R. R. (1961). “On the biology of the inhabitants of oak galls of Cynipidae (Hymenoptera) in Britain”. Transactions of the Society for British Entomology. 14: 237–268.

Gullan, P. J.; Cranston, P. S. (2014). The Insects: An Outline of Entomology (5th ed.). Wiley. pp. 365–369.

Fisher, R. C. (1 June 1961). “A Study in Insect Multiparasitism: I. Host Selection and Oviposition”(PDF). Journal of Experimental Biology. 38 (2): 267–275.

S. B. Vinson, “Host selection by insect parasitoids,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 21, pp. 109–133, 1976.
B. V. Brown and D. H. Feener, “Behavior and host location cues of Apocephalus paraponerae (Diptera: Phoridae), a parasitoid of the giant tropical ant, Paraponera clavata(Hymenoptera: Formicidae),” Biotropica, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 182–187, 1991.
S. A. Morehead and D. H. Feener, “Visual and chemical cues used in host location and acceptance by a Dipteran parasitoid,” Journal of Insect Behavior, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 613–625, 2000.
R. H. L. Disney, Scuttle Flies: The Phoridae, Chapman ; Hall, London, UK, 1994.

D. H. Feener and B. V. Brown, “Diptera as parasitoids,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 42, pp. 73–97, 1997.
S. D. Porter, “Biology and behavior of Pseudacteondecapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae) that parasitize Solenopsisfire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae),” The Florida Entomologist, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 292–309, 1998.
F. L. Cônsoli, C. T. Wuellner, S. B. Vinson, and L. E. Gilbert, “Immature development of Pseudacteon tricuspis (Diptera : Phoridae), an endoparasitoid of the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae),” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 97–109, 2001.
D. H. Feener, “Competition between ant species: outcome controlled by parasitic flies,” Science, vol. 214, no. 4522, pp. 815–817, 1981.
D. H. Feener and B. V. Brown, “Reduced foraging of Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in the presence of parasitic Pseudacteon spp. (Diptera, Phoridae),” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 80–84, 1992.
M. R. Orr, S. H. Seike, W. W. Benson, and L. E. Gilbert, “Flies suppress fire ants,” Nature, vol. 373, no. 6512, pp. 292–293, 1995.
M. R. Orr, R. X. De Camargo, and W. W. Benson, “Interactions between ant species increase arrival rates of an ant parasitoid,” Animal Behaviour, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1187–1193, 2003.
J. Vandermeer, I. Perfecto, G. Ibarra Nuñez, S. Phillpott, and A. Garcia Ballinas, “Ants (Azteca sp.) as potential biological control agents in shade coffee production in Chiapas, Mexico,” Agroforestry Systems, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 271–276, 2002.
S. M. Philpott, “Trait-mediated effects of parasitic phorid flies (Diptera: Phoridae) on ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) competition and resource access in coffee agro-ecosystems,” Environmental Entomology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1089–1094, 2005.
R. H. L. Disney, Scuttle Flies: The Phoridae, Chapman ; Hall, London, UK, 1994.

L. E. M. Vet and D. R. Papaj, “Effects of experience on parasitoid movement in odour plumes,” Physiological Entomology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 90–96, 1992.
S. D. Porter, “Biology and behavior of Pseudacteondecapitating flies (Diptera: Phoridae) that parasitize Solenopsisfire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae),” The Florida Entomologist, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 292–309, 1998.
C. T. Wuellner, C. G. Dall’Aglio-Holvorcem, W. W. Benson, and L. E. Gilbert, “Phorid fly (Diptera: Phoridae) oviposition behavior and fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) reaction to attack differ according to phorid species,” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 257–266, 2002.
K. A. Mathis, S. M. Philpott, and R. F. Moreira, “Parasite lost: chemical and visual cues used by Pseudacteon in search of Azteca instabilis,” Journal of Insect Behavior, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 186–199, 2010.
V. Gazal, O. Bailez, and A. M. Viana-Bailez, “Mechanism of host recognition in Neodohrniphora elongata (Brown) (Diptera: Phoridae),” Animal Behaviour, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 1177–1182, 2009.
V. S. G. Silva, O. Bailez, A. M. Viana-Bailez, A. Tonhasca, and T. M. Castro Della Lucia, “Survey of Neodohrniphora spp. (Diptera: Phoridae) at colonies of Atta sexdens rubropilosa(FOREL) and specificity of attack behaviour in relation to their hosts,” Bulletin of Entomological Research, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 203–206, 2008.
M. R. Orr, S. H. Seike, and L. E. Gilbert, “Foraging ecology and patterns of diversification in dipteran parasitoids of fire ants in south Brazil,” Ecological Entomology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 305–314, 1997.
L. E. Gilbert and L. W. Morrison, “Patterns of host specificity in Pseudacteon parasitoid flies (Diptera: Phoridae) that attack Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae),” Environmental Entomology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1149–1154, 1997.
L. W. Morrison, C. G. Dall’aglio-Holvorcem, and L. E. Gilbert, “Oviposition behavior and development of Pseudacteon flies (Diptera: Phoridae), parasitoids of Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae),” Environmental Entomology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 716–724, 1997.
M. A. Pesquero, S. Campiolo, H. G. Fowler, and S. D. Porter, “Diurnal patterns of ovipositional activity in two Pseudacteonfly parasitoids (Diptera: Phoridae) of Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae),” The Florida Entomologist, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 455–457, 1996.
S. D. Porter, H. G. Fowler, S. Campiolo, and M. A. Pesquero, “Host specificity of several Pseudacteon (Diptera: Phoridae) parasites of fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in South America,” The Florida Entomologist, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 70–75, 1995. 
L. W. Morrison and L. E. Gilbert, “Parasitoid-host relationships when host size varies: the case of Pseudacteonflies and Solenopsis fire ants,” Ecological Entomology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 409–416, 1998.
L. Chen, K. R. Sharma, and H. Y. Fadamiro, “Fire ant venom alkaloids act as key attractants for the parasitic phorid fly, Pseudacteon tricuspis (Diptera: Phoridae),” Naturwissenschaften, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 1421–1429, 2009.
M. A. L. Bragança, L. M. de Souza, C. A. Nogueira, and T. M.C. Della Lucia, “Parasitism by Neodohrniphora spp. Malloch (Diptera, Phoridae) on workers of Atta sexdens ribropilosaForel (Hymenoptera, Formicidae),” Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 300–302, 2008.


I'm Owen!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out